User:AnnettHodson8

Australian Federal Police did not know a Bahraini soccer player was a refugee who feared persecution in his homeland when the agency alerted Bahrain and Thailand that he was on a flight bound for Bangkok, Australian officials said Monday. Australian Border Force Commissioner Michael Outram told a Senate committee he blamed human error within his own agency for a failure to email to police Hakeem al-Araibi's refugee status in time. But Outram would not concede under questioning by senators that the 25-year-old former Bahrain national soccer team player would not have been arrested in Bangkok on Nov. 27 without the Australian tip-off.


Police Deputy Commissioner Ramzi Jabbour told the committee Bahrain and Thailand were alerted by police almost six hours before al-Araibi landed after a nine-hour flight from Melbourne on his honeymoon. The bungle drew the Australian government, international soccer bodies and human rights advocates into a top-level dispute with the Thai and Bahrain governments to gain al-Araibi's freedom. He was detained at the airport and was held 76 days under threat of extradition to Bahrain before he was released last week and returned to Melbourne. The rules of international policing organization Interpol prevent a Red Notice from being issued for an acknowledged refugee to be sent back to the country from which he or she fled persecution.


Australian officials face days of questioning by a Senate committee this week to determine how the bungle arose. The Australian Border Force did not advise Australian police that al-Araibi was a refugee until a day after he was detained in Thailand, Colvin said. Interpol subsequently withdrew the Red Notice, but Bahrain did not drop its bid to extradite al-Araibi until last week. Jabbour said Bahrain issued the Red Notice on the same day Thailand issued al-Araibi a tourist visa. Bahrain Red Notice, Jabbour said. Australian law does not allow for al-Araibi's arrest in Australia under a Bahrain Red Notice and warrant. Bahrain had wanted al-Araibi to serve a 10-year prison sentence for an arson attack that damaged a police station. The former Bahrain national soccer team player has denied those charges, which he was convicted of in absentia, and says the case is politically motivated. He said he believed he was targeted for arrest because of his Shiite faith and because his brother was politically active in Bahrain. Bahrain has a Shiite majority but is ruled by a Sunni monarchy.


One reason for the rise in climate litigation is that the science is becoming ever better understood. That provides a deeper and richer evidence base that - unlike much of our parliamentary debate or the shadowy conspiracist corners of the internet - can withstand cross-examination. Companies know they must account for tighter carbon constraints sooner or later. Professor van Asselt singles out the advance of "attribution science" - identifying the likelihood of specific extreme weather events (and the damage they cause) being linked to human-driven climate change. In other words, in time there will be a rapid assessment of whether the severe heatwaves that smashed Australia's January heat records, or this month's floods in Queensland, have a climate link. Then it will be up to the courts and insurers to argue it out.


But whether it is the Rocky Hill case, another against Adani's Carmichael mine or even a new coal-fired power plant, companies know they must account for tighter carbon constraints sooner or later. Few big economic gatherings now take place without climate risk at the forefront. In the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report for 2019, extreme weather events topped the worry list for a third consecutive year. Of the top five risks, three were environmental and the other two were data fraud and cyber attacks. Minter Ellison's Sarah Barker says. There’s no magic to it. It comes down to 'what is your role as a director? But it doesn't end there. Every company has a responsibility to examine the threats posed - a market shift away from fossil fuels, or potential impact from more extreme weather or [https://matthewmitchell.com.au/divorce-lawyer-adelaide/ Solicitors Adelaide] rising sea levels - and do something about it.


A tanking share price in the wake of a delayed or impartial exposure is a magnet for litigants, as oil giant Exxon is finding to its cost in the US courts. Recognition of climate risks from burning its product by Exxon's own scientists half a century ago is another magnet. Nor is it merely a private sector concern, as noted last month by the Centre for Policy Development in a discussion paper on directors' duties and climate change. It found that "despite impediments to enforcement, public sector directors are now increasingly likely to be closely scrutinised and held to account for climate risk management - especially given rising standards demanded of private corporations".


On March 12, the deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, Guy Debelle, will also weigh in with a speech on climate change and the economy at a public forum hosted by the Centre for Policy Development in Sydney. Then again, it could hardly appeal against its own judgement, even if the case was expanded beyond the government's original intent. Federal Resources Minister Matt Canavan recommended people "should proceed with caution" about over-interpreting a decision "in a lower court and in NSW". If the histories of tobacco and asbestos litigation are any guide, any attempts to shield companies from climate litigation won't be easy. ] Minister's original refusal of the development consent.


In 2006, the Australian government (Liberal/National Coalition) and the opposition (Labor party) unanimously passed the Shared Parental amendments to the Family Law act, which has since become internationally recognised as ground-breaking, child-focussed laws in line with modern day societal values. Recently updated Family Court outcomes have however been very disappointing, showing that despite the 2006 amendments, only 15% of fathers have been able to secure shared parenting through the Courts. Having said that, there has still been a noticeable upswing in shared parenting arrangements, from 3% pre-2006 to 15% post-2006, and this trend may continue upwards as the resistance slowly begins to wane.


Prior to 2006, the affidavit was primarily used as a tool for character assassination of the other parent, because the goal was to remove one parent from the equation in order to gain sole custody. With the dawning of the 2006 Shared Parenting laws, the tactical purpose of the affidavit, at least where most fathers are concerned, has fundamentally changed. Rather than a tool to convince the Court that it is dangerous to leave the child/ren in the care of the Mother, now the emphasis is to highlight the benefits to the children of Shared Parenting. This by definition involves an emphasis on the many positive qualities and circumstances of both parents. Most mothers finding themselves in Court of course do not seek Shared parenting arrangements, and will still be demanding sole custody, so be prepared for an affidavit from the mother that will be highly critical of you.


Such affidavits however, if not credible, will reflect poorly on the mother. What is important however is that you do not feel distressed at the criticism coming your way, enough so to make you respond in kind. Just continue playing a straight bat, be honest and fair, and the criticisms will fall by the wayside. Even if some of the criticisms are fair, the best way to handle it is to show acceptance and remorse for your error, and show a willingness to address the issue. This could be through counselling, medication or other measures. Often, separating parents have distinct differences in parenting styles, and at other times they feel ongoing resentment to each other for perceived past indiscretions.


These views and feelings can interfere with one parent's assessment of the parent's parenting abilities. In truth however, most parents love their children, and have many positive parental qualities. In this day and age, many fathers are well equipped to parent a child and run a household, being that most fathers engage in such responsibilities from the outset. For this reason, some fathers may refuse to attend post-separation parenting courses, fearing that this could imply that they were never engaged in the parenting of the children in the past. These courses however are designed not to help you cook, clean or manage your child's time, but to manage your common responsibilities with the other parent. Attending such courses is seen by the Courts as an indication of your willingness to make Shared Parenting work.


In the heat of separation, many people say things that they don't mean. It goes without saying that you MUST REFRAIN from making hurtful or threatening comments during separation, as these could cause genuine fear in the other parent, regardless of your true intent. Although some obscure comments may be ignored in some instances, written messages with sinister themes will invariably come back to haunt you. NEVER EVER send acrimonious, spiteful, threatening or argumentative emails or SMS texts to the other parent, regardless of how justified you may think they may be. Emails and SMS messages are now one of the most common forms of evidence tabled in the Family Court, and by their very nature are often indisputable. They are effectively used in Court as convincing proof that shared parenting will not work in your case, because of an underlying inability of the parents to co-operate.


NEVER EVER buy into arguments from the other parent. These arguments have no purpose but to ferment more argument, so any emotional response by you, typically in your defence, will simply encourage more of the same. Any evidence of such disputes will diminish your prospects of getting Shared Care, so you have a concrete reason to ignore these comments. Always remember the mantra that "silence is golden", and if you care enough about your child's final parenting arrangements, you will simply refuse to get involved in such counter-productive arguments. Having said that, when a response is required, a constructive, logical, non-emotional response is the order of the day.


Children suffer when their parents separate, and they suffer even more when they are involved directly in the dispute. Never ever criticise the other parent to the child. Never attempt to alienate the child from the other parent. Parental alienation happens all too often, given that children are too young to make such decisions themselves. Your obligation to your child is to promote the best possible relationship for that child with you and the other parent, regardless of your personal views of the other parent. Anything less than this is another form of child abuse. Never make unfounded allegations of child abuse.


Child protection services and the Family Law Courts are overwhelmed with false allegations of child abuse, and such unfounded allegations can reflect poorly on the alleging parent. Although the Court must consider the benefits of an equal time arrangement between the parents, do not use this as an excuse to demand 50:50 time, without considering many other important factors. For example, 50:50 may not be practical, given your work commitments and other commitments. Keep in mind that 50:50 parenting will involve a significant amount of your personal time, so you must balance this off against all the other factors you will be considering. A good approach is to try to determine what may be the optimal time sharing arrangement for you and your child, not the ideal time sharing arrangement.


Many fathers have accepted Shared Parenting arrangements, on average involving 4 to 5 days/nights per fortnight, as optimal in this regard. Keep in mind that your goal is to ensure a meaningful relationship with your child that stands the test of time. Negotiations over Child Custody should be treated like any other type of negotiations. All negotiations work best when both parties are flexible and open to compromise. As a father involved in a Child Custody disagreement, your first official attempt to secure a Child Custody arrangement would be through mediation at a Family Relationship Centre. Some Counsellors and Family Advisors have lamented that many parents attend mediation either with fixed and unmovable demands, or others come to mediation unsure about what they seek.


In both circumstances, informed compromise becomes impossible. Another issue for parents that go to mediation unprepared is that they often feel pressured and bullied into agreeing to an arrangement that on reflection is not what they believe is optimal or appropriate. The pressure applied on a parent during mediation, especially the parent seen to be least demanding, cannot be under-estimated. Preparation is the keyword here. Work out what you believe is the optimal arrangement for you and your child, and then determine various arrangements that would still provide the same outcome. Be open-minded during mediation. Your ex will be required to explain her resistance, and you may be able to address her concerns without reducing your overall time with your child. Remember that compromise need not mean accepting less time with your child. This is a lot harder than it sounds, especially given the tremendous amount of stress you may be under, and the likelihood that you may be experiencing depression. For your children's sake, always scrutinise and question your motivation when involved in a Child Custody dispute, no matter how painful to you. Despite the fact that this Top 10 list refers to fathers directly, it can be applied just as equally to mothers in the same situation.


London: Australian diplomats have reportedly visited Julian Assange in Ecuador’s embassy in London to hear firsthand about what his lawyer says is his "deteriorating health". Greg Barns, an Australian lawyer and adviser to Assange and WikiLeaks, revealed the visit had taken place. He said he and his colleagues will now directly appeal to Foreign Minister Marise Payne to petition the UK government to let Assange leave the embassy for urgent medical care without being arrested. But for now the WikiLeaks co-founder and publisher will have to content himself with an offer of "continued consular support", The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age understand. The Australian High Commission in London refused to comment on the visit, even to confirm it took place, referring all questions to the Department of Foreign Affairs in Canberra - a clear sign the situation is still a diplomatic quagmire.


But Barns said it was the second such visit - the first took place in June last year. He said this was a sign of a "more humane approach" from the Australian government. The visit came a day before Assange received bad news from the US, where a federal judge refused to force the Justice Department to admit the existence of what are believed to be criminal charges laid against him in secret. Assange has been in the embassy, a small office in an apartment block behind Harrods in Knightsbridge, for more than six years. He entered on June 19, 2012, after exhausting his appeals against an extradition order to go to Sweden to face rape and sexual assault allegations.


Swedish authorities have since closed their investigation saying it couldn't continue without Assange's presence in their country. However Assange still faces arrest by London police if he steps out of the Ecuadorian embassy for breach of his bail conditions, after failing in a bid last year to have the arrest warrant cancelled by an English court. Assange’s lawyers say he cannot leave the embassy due to the likelihood of being extradited to the US, where they say he would not receive a fair trial. Barns said they welcomed the visit by High Commission consular officials, who were briefed on Assange's medical issues and difficulties. "They have seen firsthand the untenable situation Julian is in," he said. "His health is deteriorating yet he cannot get medical care for fear of arrest.


Barns said Assange was suffering chronic pain in one arm and needs dental work, neither of which can be treated inside the embassy. Assange’s health continues to decline, he said. On Wednesday, a US District Judge refused a request from WikiLeaks to force the Justice Department to reveal a secret criminal charge against Assange. The judge said allowing access to judicial records "based on little more than speculation" amounted to a fishing expedition and would set a bad precedent. WikiLeaks called the ruling "ridiculous". The Herald and The Age has contacted DFAT for more information about the consular visit. The UK’s Home Office declined to comment but pointed to Foreign Office Minister Sir Alan Duncan's statement in Parliament in June last year, in which he said Assange was in the embassy "of his own choice". "We are, however, increasingly concerned about his health," Duncan said in the statement. "It is our wish that this is brought to an end, and we would like to make the assurance that if he were to step out of the embassy, he would be treated humanely and properly.


At the beginning of every financial year, the migration program for the next year is announced by the Minister. There are general planning levels or system numbers which incorporate the candidates applying from abroad and inside Australia. When comparing the same period for skilled migration in Australia, there were 53,520 visas in 2001-2002 and there were 97,000 skilled visas in 2006-2007 period. This depicts a vast difference of the skilled workers' migration, compared to the families that moved to Australia. Likewise, when the humanitarian visas granted were analyzed, there was an increase in 2001-2002 to 2006-2007 with 9,960 to 13,000 visas respectively. The finance ministry of the country has forecasted a further increase in both non-humanitarian and humanitarian programs. The migration affect on wages is also forecasted to be high. The migration allowed every year is regulated by the government.


The number of visas that may be permitted in any visa class in a financial year is determined by the Minister, who can impose limitation on it as well. However, the limitation imposed by the Minister can be limited for a year and must be notified in the Gazette Notice. An audit of the Attorney General's register as of June 2008 uncovered that limitations for 2007-2008 have been entered in the Gazette only for contributory parents and contributory aged parents' visas. Likewise, the government grants power to the minister to stop all processing of visa provisions once the maximum limit has been reached. This is called as 'cap and terminate provision', however it has not often been utilized.


If you are planning to buy, sell or conveyance property, you will need the services of an estate lawyer. While you are fully capable of performing these transactions on your own, these transactions require a lot of legal documentation which can be handled easily by your estate lawyer. This is especially important when the property is involved in an estate dispute or has had a difficult past. To make things easier for you, most estate lawyers will have a major referral network throughout the country. They are in touch with real estate agents and can easily help you purchase or sell the property you want. They are also regularly in contact with various other agencies that are related to the sale and purchase of property. In all these transactions, the estate lawyer acts as a facilitator.


They develop and maintain a real working relationship with you and ensure that all the legal procedures are followed to the letter. If you want to transfer the title deed of your property to someone else, you will definitely need an estate lawyer. An estate lawyer can help you in many different ways when you want to purchase a property. 1. Enquiring and searching for properties on your behalf. 2. Obtaining all legal documents and clearances for the property in question. 3. Making appropriate adjustments wherever there are changes in rates and other charges attached to the property. 4. Obtaining discounts and concessions that you are entitled to from the Australian Government or any other related agencies.


5. Transferring legal title of the property wherever necessary. 6. Meeting any legal requirements of the financiers. 7. Advising all the necessary authorities about your particular purchase. 8. Keeping your agent fully informed throughout the process of purchase. While an estate lawyer can help you buy the property you wanted, they can also help you sell your previously owned property. Here's what they can do for you. 1. The lawyer sets the terms of your payment and ensures that you are paid in full. 2. If there are any pending mortgages, the estate lawyer ensures that these are discharged properly. 3. Preparing all required legal documentation and getting it signed. 4. Settling all the contracts by the due date. 6. Ensuring that you meet all the legal obligations under the contract so that you are protected in case the buyer fails to meet their obligations.


To some, Tahnee Camilleri had it made. She was young, a lawyer in Australia, was making a good living. But she didn’t want to be a lawyer. She wanted to be a trainer. And she didn’t want to be a trainer in Australia or New Zealand, but in the U.S. So, last spring she embarked on what seemed like a foolhardy adventure. She packed away her diplomas in a box, moved to the U.S. "Really, this is my passion and I can always go back to the law if it doesn’t work out," she said. The law is going to have to wait. Entering Wednesday, Camilleri, 32, had won 16 of 33 starts since establishing her stable, which races primarily at the Meadowlands and Yonkers. "I got on a bit of a roll," she said.


"I’ve gotten good draws, have had good drivers driving for me and I’m lucky that things fell into place the way they did. Her stable currently numbers just five horses, but another is on its way. All have been imported from her native Australia. The star is Constntlysidewys, who is 4 for 10 and has won at the preferred level at the Meadowlands. "There just happened to be trainer not too far from my new home who raced at Fairfield Racetrack in New South Wales," she said. "I just walked over one day and said I really love horses and I’m sad that I had to sell my horse. If you don’t mind I’ll help you around the stable for free, just so I could be around horses. Over the next several years she juggled her education with her penchant for the horses.